Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


WheatsheafSK last won the day on April 9 2018

WheatsheafSK had the most liked content!

About WheatsheafSK

  • Rank
    Game Day Squad

Contact Methods

  • Website URL

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location


  • Location
    Ottawa, Ontario

Recent Profile Visitors

1,002 profile views
  1. Hard to argue that Barcelona and Ajax do not have a "special" relationship considering the influence that Michels and Cruijff have had on the two clubs, and the shared philosophies. In fact it is that shared philosophy in developing academy players that undermines your suggestion that Ajax abuses the loan arrangements more than Barca. I agree that Barca and Ajax are not attached at the hip and Barca has bought numerous great players from PSV and Feyenoord as well (e.g. Romorio, Ronaldo, Larsson, Koeman, Van Bronkhurst). However, that combination of shared philosophies, managers and influential players do set Ajax and Barca's relationship apart. I would not want Tabla to join Ajax as I would be concerned that he would end up with Jong Ajax in the Ereste Divisie (second divisions) which would be below his current team's competition. As to your point about big club buying success - I could not agree more. The only good thing about this rumoured agreement between Ajax and Barca is that it is public. The problem with such agreements is that they are never made public and there is no clear way to evaluate them. That said, I much prefer this openess to the hidden agreements e.g. Chelsea-Vitesse where Chelsea has loaned approx. 50 players to Vitesse, Abramavich is alleged to have financed the purchase of Vitesse, yet both clubs maintain there is no special relationship. Chelsea has bought so many youth players and have used to Vitesse to dumped them off Chelsea's books while placing them in the shop window. I don't mind the when a team makes key purchases (e.g. de Jong to Barca) but I dislike when the entire team (and potentially the development squad) is filled with transfers.
  2. Can't help but feel that he is heading back overseas. He had a contract for 2019 and an option for 2020. At 32, he still has a few years left. Does not seem logical to walk away from a contract at this stage of the game unless he has equivalent options elsewhere. Even if MDS indicated that he would have a limited role going forward, at 32 I would think he would stay and fight for his spot while still under contract. I would be surprised if MDS told a versatile player like de Jong that he had no future with the Caps - especially as the team needs experienced players. I would not be surprised that he gets picked up for the remainder of the season at a lower-league Eredivisie side.
  3. This is great move for Cordova as the Caps have a lot of positions that need filling. The loan agreement is good testing ground for both caps and Cordova. Plus it will be nice to be able to see what this kid can do in the MLS. Re MDS signing Canadians - my perspective is that they are trying get domestics at low cost to fill slots. These players may be underrated and it is a great opportunity for them, but I don't see them walking onto the team. MDS has been good to Canadians - but he has also been smart to slot in bigger talents or more experienced players as well. MDS is basically having to rebuild the entire squad - recent signings provide depth but I suspect bigger signings are coming. I would not be surprises if a more experienced defensive re-enforcement arrives in the next month or during the summer transfer window.
  4. Come back to Toronto. They need another goalkeeper. Besides, might finally settle the eternal debate of Bono vs. Roberts - or just add more fuel.
  5. I would hate to think where we would be without the 3 MLS teams and their academies. Likely we would still have a team half-full of unattached players and question marks on where the future players are coming from. CMNT has a big mountain to climb to get to the WC and having three professional teams was never going to be a quick fix from where we were starting. Also - it has only been 2 WC since we had three teams in the MLS. Whitecaps and Impact were not in the MLS for the 2010 WC - let alone for the qualifying round. Also also - not hilarious. CPL existence and Canada's participation in 2026 are unrelated from a competitive qualifying perspective. CPL players will not be helping Canada qualify for 2026 (assuming Canada is handed a spot). Perhaps some CPL players could help CMNT qualify for 2022, but we are unlikely to see any real impact by the CPL on CMNT qualifying before the 2030 round. So - again this puts us in line with the current MLS to WC example.
  6. I never said you were an Ottawa hater, but I can see how that would be inferred. I don't mean to pick on you, but you are just so damn quotable! Often one of your comments has helped me to make a broader point. So I should thank you for that. I very much appreciate your comments on the forum, but we are on opposite sides on this one. To your second point, I do feel obliged to point out that this particular back and forth was due to you saying "that some team in Ottawa would help the CPL" and since it did not look like the Fury would play ball then is should be some other team moving in. My point was that one can't expect a new team to be created with a snap of the fingers and expect it to succeed. Ottawa has along list of failed sports franchises. A failed Ottawa franchise is no help to a new league. I respectfully disagree with you and argue that point was not obtuse.
  7. Actually - a dispute resolution mechanism is only binding if the parties agree or if mandated by law. A dispute resolution mechanism could include mediation - which is non-binding, or parties could agree to non-binding arbitration, binding conciliation, binding arbitration... A dispute resolution mechanism could also be created by way of legislation. In fact some court statutes require parties to attend mediation first.
  8. He is likely referring to the Sport Dispute Resolution Centre of Canada which is established under Physical Activity and Sports Act. Of course this being Canada, there may be a dispute resolution mechanism at the provincial level. I have limited experience with SDRCC so I am not sure if you would appeal to the Court of Arbitration in Switzerland. Certainly, as a federal tribunal you could judicially review any decision by the SDRCC. Just to be clear, I am not familiar enough with CONCACAF rules to know whether a challenge in the domestic jurisdiction is permitted or if you have to go to the Court of Sports Arbitration. I am simply mentioning what federal legislation would be applicable since you asked.
  9. You are right. Killing a team that supports Canadian soccer players, and just giving a franchise to the city so that there is one in Ottawa and then see it die in a year would be the best move for CanPL and Canadian soccer. The point I keep making is that all the Fury haters on here make it sound like it is so easy to create a successful team in Ottawa. It is not. I am firm believer that killing the Fury is no way to help the CanPL.
  10. Yes because Ottawa FC playing at Terry Fox was a real boom for the CSL. Point is - just throwing a team into Ottawa does not equate to success. OSEG may not be perfect, but they have been a strong supporter of soccer in this city.
  11. You realize this contradicts your earlier assertion that this was all CONCACAF fault and no blame should be apportioned elsewhere? Besides CSA sanctioned Fury to play in USL in 2019.
  12. At the time of Ottawa's move to the USL it was mentioned that the team had to pay $2M expansion fee, and that this was better than the losses they would have suffered staying in the NASL.
  13. I think your geography is off. Buffalo is for when TorontoFC is forced to relocate. For the Fury it would be to Syracus or Canton - maybe Lake Placid.
  • Create New...