Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Havoc88

  • Rank
    Late Game Sub

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling


  • Location
    , , .

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. The way MLS is changing/evolving, I think it will be very difficult. I'm sure most are either looking at CanPL or abroad. MLS seems to be more interested in signing S.Americans these days then developing their own players. That being said, the top Sigma players year to year still get drafted and MLS teams are taking players from the best NCAA programs, even when they don't have a great year (ie Mo Adams was a Syracuse and they had a poor season). I think if you're still at a high profile program, with a track record of producing MLS talent (Syracuse, Akron, Indiana, Maryland, Wake Forest, Louisville, UNC etc...) you still have a decent shot. The fact a bunch of guys above are going to programs that have had ROY players (ie Gressell and Larin) will help their chances.
  2. Interesting development - TFC sent three kids to high profile programs Rimi Olatunji / Providence - Gianluca Catalano & Steffen Yeates going to UCONN Providence is where 2017 ROY Julian Gressel went to school. We all know UCONN. Anyways - TFC, unless anyone can point otherwise, has been very late to the game in terms of sending academy grads, who aren't ready for the leap, into a top NCAA program. IMO this is smart so they can keep rights and allow them minutes they might not otherwise get.
  3. Well when I was trying to figure out Iheanacho and Tchouambou, Iheanacho was called up to the U15 team. If I could put my tinfoil hat on for a minute - I would suggest first it's probably easy to just call up players from TFC/VAN/MTL and know you'll get a decent level of development. It's unfortunate but you would hope/expect at this point to see more Foothills, Sigma, Vaughan (and I'm sure people here could throw in many more teams) players scattered in the call ups, but it would also require much more extensive scouting, at least in the traditional sense, or player awareness in the form of some kind of central scouting database which nobody in Canada seems that interested in. Part of me wonders too if there is a political element as well ie the three MLS clubs put in so much $$$ that they either need, demand or secure their kids are front line for CanMNT call ups. I mean, as it stands the optics are if you want to play for Canada your best shot is coming through those three academies.
  4. I know there isn't the same hype around the collegiate game as a few years back, but I still thought it would be worth sharing some insight/analysis of some players seen at the SIgma showcase a month ago and information on a few players already committed to programs for 2018. I will preface this the same as last year where Aaron Neilsen and I spent a full day at the event watching as many academies as possible and keeping an eye out for some players we had already heard about to see/confirm if there were as advertised. Of course, the main issue is seeing only the second day and gauging how much the players are putting into these exhibition games. However, one thing is for certain, every year when Sigma and Vaughan go head to head, they go all out and you really get to see a tight game. If you look at the NCAA 2017 thread I think my review is still on page 1, so you'll note some of the players from last year remain as prospects up until today. Up front, this was probably the best showcase we've seen yet, as this was an even better Sigma side in terms of player potential than last year, and this was the first time we saw real talent on a team outside of Sigma and Vaughan (Durham). Pretty much every game had a team with some interesting players to watch and assess. Ok on to Sigma. Two players from this 2000 / A1 team have already committed and I will make note as I run through key prospects. This team was very well organized from the back and probably the most cohesive A1 team I've seen from back to front over the last four years. The centre back pairing were from the B1 team last year and they have come along nicely. Now that I'm looking at the team sheet I'm worried I'm mixing these two guys up. There is a shorter CB who is built like a brick sh*thouse, Dumebi Iheanacho who lead the back and was very solid. I don't know if his future is at CB because he is 5'9, but who knows, he could definitely be an RB. His parter, Cheikh Tchouambou, I feel was the star of the backline and because of his size (6'1), pace could be a future RB (I think he got L1O minutes at RB) or still be CB to keep an eye on. He has good ups and headed a corner off the woodwork in one of the matches. At the time I wasn't sure how highly I rated him, but part of me thinks that #8/DM Mathew Kolakowski might have the biggest upside from this team, if only for his incredible work rate and constant tenacity on and off the ball. He's not a big kid but was fearless tracking down the ball, was smart getting into positions off the ball and tidy with his passing. He apparently has a reputation in training where no one wants to work with him because he's always going at 100%. Of course the only red flag is that surname HA HA :S I would flag him as one to watch as he seemed like someone who will always be working harder and constantly striving to improve. I don't have any details on him yet, but was told there was a good chance he would have committed to a school once the showcase was over, so this is a name we should be hearing about with regards to a program. The player it seemed like Sigma were very excited about was Hilli Goldhar, who has committed to Syracuse. The first match I saw him I didn't really notice to be honest, however, the second game against Vaughan he really stepped up and his attributes of tireless workrate, really good pace, and high technical ability were all on display. He wears #10 and had one moment where he took a free kick and bent it waist high around the wall to force the keeper into an diving save. His technical awareness is really high and should fit in well at Cuse. Up top, striker Ivan Nikolic has committed to Akron, and while he didn't score any goals on this day, he was active up top, had good size where he still has room to fill out (as in he was a bit wirey) but par for course with Sigma was a very technical player with the ball at his feet, held it up well and distributed to his teammates. I would expect the three guys not already committed to be off to good programs next year. Baj Mann (keeper) is 6'4 and didn't see much action but I remember him from last year as being pretty good, Justin Sotys also was a player who I feel likely will be in D1 next year as well. We only watched one B1 game but will publicly make note of a kid named Jonothan Neil who looked pretty good as an attacker and created alot in the game we saw. Also I think it's a safe bet that Kofi Awuah might be Kwame's younger brother, so he'll be one to watch next year as well. We only saw one match from Vaughan this year and I'm pretty sure Ryan Raposo, who has committed to Syracuse, was not playing. Not sure if people here are aware of him but many are pretty high on him as a future prospect.Unfortunately, the player I think who stood out the most for Vaughan I can't find out who he is!! There was a #11 who, when he had the ball at his feet, was VERY good at taking on players and scored the only goal against Sigma by pretty much tooling the LB and burying the chance he made for himself. So finally, the last team/players of note were from Durham. This was a team who last year dominated their division and has a couple players who were off the charts in terms of goals. They played very well, usually starting slow with one striker up top alone, but as the two games proceeded, they really turned it on and brought heaps of attacking pressure. THis was clearly a team who have played together for some times as they were very much in sync and had many "Wooooooooooo" moments of flicks and tricks. I made note of them last year and can now comment on having seen for myself. I will start by saying of the years I've gone to the showcase, easily the best individual talent seen was Duwayne Ewart. Now coming in second, for me, is O'Vonte Mullings. He didn't score any goals but his talent on and off the ball was the best I saw during the day. He always knew where to be, and any ball sent up to him he always made the right decision, whether it be a simple short pass back or off to the side, or take on his player 1v1 - I don't think I saw him turn over or be dispossessed in the two games I saw him. His best moment was taking down a crossfield long ball off his chest down to his feet, and with his back to a 6'+ CB closing him down, volleyed it over the defender, spun around him backdoor to pick up the ball and dribble it to the touch line to cross it into the 6yr box, which unfortunately was not converted. My one concern was his work rate, as it appeared to be pretty casual at times and can see NCAA coaches possibly flagging that as a negative. However, his skills are undeniable. I will fully concede that I had similar thoughts regarding Ewart and he has yet to advance his career, but do feel sometimes the right environment is everything and I hope we hear more from Mullings in the future. Lastly, speaking of Ewart, his younger brother Dumari Ewart was very noticeable on this team as well. It was pretty unfortunate because he could have been the player of the showcase as in the day we saw him he created about 4-5 1v1 chances with the keeper and couldn't convert any of them. He had really good pace and was able to beat defenders from 20+ yards out to within the 18 for these chances... but it was not to be. However, he has alot to offer and could be a good winger for sure. Apologies for the crazy length on this post but thought it would be useful to keep an eye on these guys as there were so many players I feel need to keep playing and could potentially turn pro. Finally, ESSU did a podcast on this showcase and interviewed Bobby Smyrniotis regarding the event - just skip to 30 min mark where Aaron and I discuss it or the 40 min mark for the interview. Thanks. iTunes: https://itunes.apple.com/ca/podcast/east-side-stand-up/id386508579?mt=2 PlayerFM: https://player.fm/series/east-side-stand-up
  5. LOL footballers often start their senior careers at 16?? Wow thanks for the insight. All this time I thought most 16yr olds were playing on U17 academy teams. Next thing you know you're going to tell us all Sam PIette is fat.
  6. LOL well you clearly have no idea what the average prime years is in world football.
  7. I'm glad we've all reached an understanding.
  8. The Europa League is a six round competition (ok well, four rounds, a stage and a phase!) Teams that finish lower in their league table don't have to qualify for the Europa League. Your final league position IS the qualifying. Teams that finish lower begin at a different stage of the tournament. The only thing they are "qualifying" for is moving on/advancing to the next round. At no point are teams not in the Europa League or at any point competing to get into the tournament. I don't disagree that the competition is easier in the earlier rounds (as they are easier in the group stage compared to the knockout phase), but to say Henry didn't play in a Europa League fixture and was just in a qualifying match is incorrect. Just say he didn't play in the group stage lol. Or if you think the Europa League starts at the group stage (which it does not) just say it only gets good at the group stage!
  9. Sorry don't mean to pile in, but for this tournament you qualify by where you finish in your league the previous season. That is the qualifying for the tournament. The Europa League tournament proper has various stages that have different names - the qualifying rounds get you to a playoff round, which gets you to the group stage, which gets you to the knockout round, which gets you to the final - all of that is the tournament. None of it is qualifying for the tournament.
  10. It is worth noting the year Piette would have signed with BVBII, they played in the 3.Liga - so the competition would have been good. While it is highly unlikely he would have been promoted to the senior team, playing in 3.Liga would have given him exposure to teams who potentially would get promoted. Christoph Zimmerman is currently playing with Norwich, signed directly from BVBII, so if he had been a regular he might have been able to move to a decent club.
  11. IMO this is an important post, albeit tongue in cheek. There are plenty of posts dismissing our players because of the current level of play they are at, but not factoring either the actual talent or potential of said player. "XYZ player struggles on MLS team, therefore must really be NASL/USL level. XYZ player struggled in a match for Canada, therefore should play at XYZ lower division." I have been a booster of Piette since the U17 team as I had a few sources in the team who did, and continued, to say good things about his mentality. He got minutes for the last few years, which was critical IMO, and this year would have been the crossroads to step up the level of competition. I know it is only one game, so I'm not going to celebrate quite yet, but this is encouraging. T This should flag players like Manjrekar James, or even Manny Aparicio, along with Didic and Gonzalez, who are getting minutes at a young age and might just need an opportunity in a more visible league for us to appreciate them more.
  12. 100% it was Mitchell. They didn't fire him after flaming out of WCQ and when they finally did, IIRC they didn't name a new coach for six months after that. The quote from Montopoli still drives me nuts, something to the effect of them having lots of time to sort it all out. LOL like we were so far ahead of all the competition we could just chill for a year LOL
  • Create New...