Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Juby

  • Rank
    Senior Member

Contact Methods

  • MSN
  • Website URL


  • Biography
    Michael Juby was jazz funk fusion act formed in Arnprior, Ontario in 1985 until Michael and Juby broke up in the early 2000's. In 2004, tired of being a head without a body, Michael relented and picked Juby up (who was still were Michael had left him on the side of the 401). The two have been inseperable ever since and Juby's vision has since returned...somewhat.
  • Location
    North York, Ontario, Canada.

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. *schticky juby ramblings alert* does that include the Quebec side? Because if it doesn't I think the Upper Ottawa Valley will declare around Pikwakanagan and Pembroke (couldn't stop laughing when I read your post though). From me it'd be only Canada but it occurs to me I could probably emigrate likity split to Mexico or Panama even ignoring, you know... skills, to get citizenship for any potential spawn of mine (don't worry though, you all have the monopoly on my brand of horse lunged-over confident-lacking talent-brand of football). I'm finding it funny realizing I'm more connected and would be way better off almost anywhere in the New World then in the Old World even around people I share a bit of DNA but don't really look like... over there I might have to learn a whole new ****ing alphabet and/or be called a gypsy (and knowing me I'd correct them and say Roma only to be confirmed a gypsy...) If it works out with my gf, Guyana too (awww).
  2. Yes, and as I said the second is far more likely then the first, wasn't saying it was a good chance hahaha
  3. http://www.mlssoccer.com/news/article/2013/04/04/concacaf-announces-changes-gold-cup-roster-tiebreaker-rules 'So your saying theirs a chance' haha. Technically, if we somehow beat Panama (very unlikely), and Mexico trounces Martinique (likely), then two of three group B teams fail to do better then draw (more likely then us winning), then we'd be in the quarters no? I doubt it but I'm looking forward to seeing a fully motivated squad. I don't know if this quad has what it takes but we have often been able to put on a game against the rising Panamanian squad. Sorry I'm most likely pulling a Charlie Brown kicking his football with your hearts but I find it pretty funny when the horse**** of CONCACAF works in our favour.
  4. I suppose the best team in MLS in retrospect was the big money Canadian squad, De Guzman, De Rosario, Ali Gerba etc. when they lost big against New York at the end. My favourite might honestly be the Aron Winter squad that made the semi finals but couldn't catch a win in MLS, kind of a silly topic but I'm curious about what the faithful (ie not so much me) think of the ride so far?
  5. ads are based vaguely on what google thinks you'll be interested in (my guess is you read a lot of articles saying Canada and a decent amount relating to law and order (maybe even the show)). I'm seeing 'hot Asian single's in my area' *sigh*. Sorry, almost didn't post this but figured you could all use a laugh.
  6. god, I wanted to quit posting but did we just lose to Martinique, god
  7. Actually they are the only teams, some of those teams have been out for a while, this was just the final tally for the year (we've all been keeping track on our fingers till this confirmation). And I hate debating in the Unregistarred comments section so I just wanted to add to you that the 'nuclear option' is misleading, because L1O will be using many of the same teams and players. Were going to have to figure out how to properly regulate a league one year anyway so I say we do it with the CSL's final season. Add to that, actually playing a season will create opportunities to actually entrap people before L1O.
  8. There's a new CSN article that starts to confirm what I posted a few days ago: For someone who is kind of portrayed as a yahoo, I've been sinking some serious hoops up and down this whole mess days before the pack.
  9. Like I said before, just because the third stance has more needless consequences then the other two, doesn't mean the poll is invalid, but may mean you might not like the extremity of the position most people have taken (anti-CSL and beyond comprimising). I intended to prove that that was publically an indefensible position, and you all are upset that my point has been proven. Me burdening a poll with...real world implications is not 'straw man', it's a just a mild amount of bias (boo hoo, your not the one missing out on anything this year). Researching 'straw man poll' which seems to be a combination of sayings, I am not pretending to be stupid to advance my arguement. I am successfully making the extreme side of the arguement look unpopular (not even the whole side, just the tip needlessly creating collatoral damage). If more people voted then this would be evidence that the even the public wasn't even for being as extreme as the association (which is an important implication, at 20 ish votes it's not enough though, a tad popular for this subthread but we'd have to hit 50 for it be at all relative of general public opinion (but that would assume this place is popular in regards to canadian soccer, probably)). edit: according to a wikipedia entry a 'strawman sockpuppet' would be decietfully argueing the oppositions point unwholesomely. I am only making the most extreme stance of the whole opposition look bad without completely degenerating their side, as well I'm not forcing anyone to be pro CSL at all. I'm also not being false about which side I am on. I am literally trying to point out the obviousness of just cutting off the too extreme 5% of a generally winning arguement (long term) for the good of achieving the realities of our goals, not at all making your whole side look wrong. But since someone already said 'straw man' I guess it doesn't matter whether it's accurate or not (the damage has been done).
  10. You'd think I'd fit in perfectly...
  11. The point of the poll is to prove that public opinion doesn't go as far no football for a year. However that's what the gears are turning towards, it'd help more if more people voted but it's mostly so that it's obvious that the public is aware this was at the very least mishandled. If a lot of people voted, as lame as it is it would be one of the few peices of evidence of public opinion that was against their handling (not necessarily the stance but the timing of choices). Deep down I was hoping it may slightly change the opinions of people they listen too to pressure them into being a little more moderate but I suppose realistically it will just be an example of politics clouding football for an entire season (In a ideal universe I was hoping they would get a few calls and find their stance embarressing and naturally adjust it a tad then let represent something longterm (unwilling to comprimise even when a scenario becomes a lot more straightforward).
  12. I literally made a poll trying to seperate that stance from the general side and you voted for no CSL at all this year when you could have voted for a preference for a new league and to let the CSL finish up this year. Did you change your stance? Were you confused about the poll? Or were you just pissed off about 'participate/enjoy' (he knows what I mean)? I'm not trying to ratchet anything up here, I'm wondering if you've come a little towards the middle or the vote was just a message of disapproval.
  13. It's like a bad video game that says 'Game Over' the same way when you win as when you lose.
  14. You do know that Brantford Galaxy are out right? Who exactly are you talking about??? Are you just fanning around the blame more by talking about the same people who have come up before? As I've said on numerous occasions, we actually have to try and catch the guilty (by entrapping them) instead of just hoping everyone we haven't caught will be magically cured of temptation in 2014. And be careful with what you are saying. Make sure you don't start generalizing the Serbo-croatian communities considering the vast majority involved in the CSL have nothing to do with the contreversy and have been contributing to Canadian soccer for years (I just mean make sure you don't start talking like the odd yahoo over the years who can't see anything of a certain ethnicity without going into this and that) I had just heard about that OSA threat of fines and expulsion (so I guess Ben's 'brilliant' point that I shouldn't care because they will be playing unsanctioned football is largely horse**** (I called it moronic even before this)). Looks like there getting more extreme, Why can't anybody even consider actually regulating them harshly as a middling punishment then this schorched earth policy('yes, let's anger the CSL teams will need so much they'll totally want to join our league' *rolls eyes*, total brilliance...).
  15. I don't want to be a dick but you have to get caught up before you come at me so that you understand what I'm saying instead of skipping most of it. The crux of this issue is that the CSL has a good case for this year because they were led around to believe things were being worked out and then desanctiontioning came in mid febuary (which is pretty late). The CSL is probably screwed for 2014 though, so they cannot quit the 2013 season to fight the 2013 season because then they'll lose (they won't get their 2013 back in 2014 so they have to play, I just hope it get's sorted out before the season. If your stance is standards we've done that dozens of times: Considering there would be no D-3 football at all and that the vast MAJORITY of CSL clubs are easily making proposed L1O standards (their defacto replacement in 2014) that it's not as though the CSL is a worse then nothing option. Literally, all but two CSL clubs easily make the standards that their replacements will have to achieve. But apparently their`s no wiggle room even when they realize they pulled the trigger a season to early (that`s it, mix a little bit of pragmatism into your stance for 2013, have leniency considering no D-3 football season is a big impediment to developement). Also, the CSA hasn't done much at all as far as middling punishments go, it's like the only weapon in the arsenal is a mace. As far as I know, the CSL was 'dumped' by the OSA not to long after it was given CSA sanctioning out of silly drama way before any of this stuff was happening (for real, from what I hear that one is actually uber pathetic (CSLOSA phonedrama hurtfeelings) especially compared to like...today (I think it boiled down to someone not being called and feeling betrayed...). The big point I have made (and other people have accidentaly proven for me) is that both the CSA and OSA has the necessary exective power, they can do almost whatever they want if they have agreement from all parties (the process would go forward until a review because everyone's on board). I have confirmed from Victor Montagliani that they could temporarily sanction the CSL for the 2013 season without comprimising their overall position (the only risk is the CSL doing a good job and changing peoples minds). However, without agreement, and with the death blow of putting their business on hold for the appeals process, generally the status quo would take over till the review process. So I am saying let's just go ahead and try to seriously regulate the CSL for practise alone this year instead of gearing up to not regulate them at all because your going to be kicking them out. I am aware of the list of people I need to be talking to, sadly I only have the pull to connect with a solid handful (most of whom weren`t very helpful but are least aware that people are aware that they can act (their hands aren`t tied)) so I am here 90% of the time hoping to win over enough public support to get another handful (I never pretended to be a big shot, I've been begging for help for weeks). Please help, take the most anti CSL rhetoric you want but I want people to be aware they don`t have to throw away the season to get the results (with a season and some legitimate hard work it will hasten the results)
  • Create New...