Jump to content
nfooty

CPL General

CanPL General  

290 members have voted

  1. 1. Should the CanPL have Pro/Rel?

    • Yes
      160
    • No
      130
  2. 2. Should the CanPL have playoffs?

    • Yes
      186
    • No
      104


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, BringBackTheBlizzard said:

Worth noting that Steven Sandor pointed out something very similar on the11.ca:

https://the11.ca/concacafs-attempt-to-clarify-the-fury-situation-only-serves-to-muddy-the-waters/

...And, then, with the Canadian Premier League being considered Division 1, does CONCACAF now need to explain why the three Canadian MLS teams do fit the “exceptional circumstance” criteria and the Fury does not?

And, if CONCACAF advised the CSA in the fall that it did not see the “exceptional circumstances” clause being met, why did Canada Soccer approve the Fury deal and then plan to kick it up to CONCACAF, anyway?

so it's more a case of stating the blindingly obvious. Are you going to direct infantile playground level abuse towards Steven Sandor as well?

The three MLS teams fit the criteria because, arbitrary division designations aside, the level of play between MLS & CPL/USL will be vastly different, likely forever.  The same cannot be said for the difference between CPL & USL - a difference which (IMO) will favour USL in the initial years, though the difference will likely not be vast (or in the language of the day, exceptional).

Tying MLS & CPL together because they're both Division 1 leagues is a false equivalency; the phrase refers to a position on a pyramid, not necessarily a level of play.  That level of play is the exceptional circumstance that keeps (and should keep) the MLS teams separate.

That said, completely fair point on the second sentence - there's been some massive failures in communication here, and I'm not convinced it's unintentional.

Edited by Gopherbashi

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When CPL quality surpasses MLS 5 years from now should CSA or Monty force the 3 Canadian MLS teams to switch over? They can't treat the Fury as an isolated incident, right?

Edited by PhillyJawn-guy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Macksam said:

Macron just rebranded themselves and I don’t think it’s any coincidence that it happened right before the kit reveals. I have a feeling this partnership is going to be huge.

My major concern about Macron is that they make slim fit look like relaxed fit. I’m carrying a few extra pounds, I normally wear XL, but I’m not going to buy a jersey that is skin tight, especially with my unathletic appearance. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, PhillyJawn-guy said:

When CPL quality surpasses MLS 5 years from now should CSA or Monty force the 3 Canadian MLS teams to switch over? They can't treat the Fury as an isolated incident, right?

Seriously? You did a whole thread about this. Are you unwell?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, Ams1984 said:

My major concern about Macron is that they make slim fit look like relaxed fit. I’m carrying a few extra pounds, I normally wear XL, but I’m not going to buy a jersey that is skin tight, especially with my unathletic appearance. 

Sadly, I am in this boat as well.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/13/2018 at 10:13 AM, masster said:

Some nice tidbits of CPL info from the AJ Jakubec interview on TSN 1200 in Ottawa (starts at 21:20):
https://www.tsn.ca/radio/ottawa-1200-1.1225738

Bob Young is the money behind the HFX Wanderers as well as Forge FC. He will most likely be the money behind Kitchener/Waterloo as well for 2020.

 

I feel like this seems to be getting ignored on this thread, unless I've missed it previously.  I mean, that's incredibly generous of Bob Young and it's also something that MLS went through for a decade, but I don't think it's a healthy situation for a league.  And further, the commissioner spent a lot of time talking about how many ownership groups wanted to jump in on this league.  Only starting with 7 teams and 2 of them being financed by one guy doesn't really seem to back that up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Watchmen said:

I feel like this seems to be getting ignored on this thread, unless I've missed it previously.  I mean, that's incredibly generous of Bob Young and it's also something that MLS went through for a decade, but I don't think it's a healthy situation for a league.  And further, the commissioner spent a lot of time talking about how many ownership groups wanted to jump in on this league.  Only starting with 7 teams and 2 of them being financed by one guy doesn't really seem to back that up.

Well it does if they had a motivated group in Halifax who couldn’t come up with all of the capital to start a club and the league wanted a specific geographic footprint.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, BuzzAndSting said:

Well it does if they had a motivated group in Halifax who couldn’t come up with all of the capital to start a club and the league wanted a specific geographic footprint.

Sure.  But then the narrative is "we have 20 parties interested, but not necessarily 20 parties capable of backing it financially."  That's not quite as positive as they kept making it sound.

I guess the other part for me is that they should have been more open and up front about Young's involvement with the Halifax group, instead of this coming out in an interview much later.  The league needs to be open and transparent about what's going on.

Edited by Watchmen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Watchmen said:

Sure.  But then the narrative is "we have 20 parties interested, but not necessarily 20 parties capable of backing it financially."  That's not quite as positive as they kept making it sound.

I guess the other part for me is that they should have been more open and up front about Young's involvement with the Halifax group, instead of this coming out in an interview much later.  The league needs to be open and transparent about what's going on.

I think it’s been unofficially known since earlier this year. I honestly don’t see a problem with it as long as each team is provided equal financial backing - something I’m sure the league would enforce and something I think is evident in the quality of both Forge and HFX merch, pricing, etc. As long as we have a viable team in Halifax, I could care less where the money comes from (within reason).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Watchmen said:

Sure.  But then the narrative is "we have 20 parties interested, but not necessarily 20 parties capable of backing it financially."  That's not quite as positive as they kept making it sound.

I guess the other part for me is that they should have been more open and up front about Young's involvement with the Halifax group, instead of this coming out in an interview much later.  The league needs to be open and transparent about what's going on.

A financially capable party can't make a viable stadium appear out of nowhere.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, juicy sushi said:

Kits are key.  I don’t like buying T-shirts and the polos are ok, but nothing appeals like a really good replica kit. 

I think Macron only sells authentic match kits, which is more admirable imo. I look on with disgust when Adidas, Nike or Puma supplied teams give the option of buying replicas or authentics at a huge mark up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, MtlMario said:

I hope for your sake that was an attempt at a joke.

Since it was his first bit of humour, we have to cut him some slack.

I prefer that to whole threads asking "Will the United States will slip into the sea by 2030?" and similar. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/15/2018 at 2:16 PM, MtlMario said:

I hope for your sake that was an attempt at a joke.

Indeed, otherwise half of the CPL teams will be wearing yellow pinnies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×